Historical archive — 21 September 2026. The original report attributed a $4.08 NEAR price, a 10.56% 24-hour rise and a 72.65% seven-day rise to CoinGecko at a stated collection time of 20:14:06 IST. This review did not independently reproduce those historical responses, so they remain attributed archive observations—not newly verified prices.
| CoinGecko price / one-hour change | $4.08 / −0.79% |
|---|---|
| 24-hour / seven-day change | +10.56% / +72.65% |
| Aggregate 24-hour range | $3.63–$4.44 |
| Reported volume / market value | $1.92 billion / $5.34 billion |
| Previously attributed Kraken last trade / range | About $4.0843 / $3.6258–$4.4508; historical response not reverified |
What the exchange documentation can verify
Kraken’s ticker documentation describes exchange-specific ticker information and distinguishes today’s fields, which start at midnight UTC. It is not a historical-price archive for the original collection time. The original multi-pair query concatenated pair names without separators; that citation cannot substantiate the claimed response. A valid current request would still not re-create the old observation.
Turnover is not proof of adoption
The retained $1.92 billion volume divided by $5.34 billion market value is approximately 36%. This is conditional arithmetic using the original inputs. It does not count unique investors, establish volatility, measure money available to exit or prove that the protocol gained users. The old search-trending description likewise referred to one provider, not a confirmed Google or X ranking.
NEAR’s official documentation is a working reference for protocol concepts, not evidence for the token prices above. The earlier dead documentation link and malformed market-query links have been replaced with clearly identified references. No price catalyst or forecast is asserted.
Archive clarification — 17 October 2026: Historical aggregate and exchange figures are now explicitly qualified. Malformed API citations and a dead documentation link were corrected, and the unsupported named fact-check label was removed without changing the original author. Volume is no longer described as evidence of volatility. The original URL, publication and modification date fields, image assignment and byline are unchanged. This is a correction of the historical report, not a new market update. Source review recorded at . The review was AI-assisted; no independent human editorial approval is claimed.