Historical provider snapshot. This report retains the original ZS=F display of 1,321.25 US cents per bushel, compared with a provider reference of 1,320.50 and a +0.06% change. The quoted contract month was not established. The source label was “17 September 2026 at 11:47”; its timezone was not established by this review.

Preserved figures—not newly verified exchange prices
Collection 17 September 2026, 11:57:37 UTC (17:27:37 IST)
Earlier checkpoint 1,321.50 cents per bushel; label “16 September 2026 at 18:19”, timezone unverified
Provider opening / range 1,329.50 / 1,319.75–1,330.50 cents per bushel
Provider state “open”; historical exchange-session identity not independently confirmed
Missing identifiers Delivery month and matching historical trade or settlement evidence

Why two percentage changes can differ

Using the archived inputs, (1,321.25 ÷ 1,320.50 − 1) × 100 rounds to +0.06%. Comparing the same quote with the separate 1,321.50 checkpoint rounds to −0.02%. Both can be arithmetically consistent because they use different reference values. Neither calculation verifies the inputs or proves a market cause.

The official unit is not a farmgate price

CBOT Rulebook Chapter 11 specifies a 5,000-bushel soybean contract and a quarter-cent-per-bushel minimum fluctuation, equivalent to $12.50 per contract. The retained 1,321.25-cent display is $13.2125 per bushel by conversion, not $1,321.25 per bushel. The rulebook does not identify the expiry behind ZS=F or authenticate the old quote. The old range-position calculation is no longer promoted as an independently verified session statistic.

Archive clarification — 17 October 2026: The missing delivery month and quote-timezone limitations are now visible in the headline/summary and body. Repetitive driver checklists and an unsupported impression of a fully identified session range were removed while preserving the raw observations. The original URL, publication and modification date fields, image assignment and byline are unchanged. This is a correction of the historical report, not a new market update. Source review recorded at . The review was AI-assisted; no independent human editorial approval is claimed.